Wolf Criminal Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Bill Wolf
    • Jack DeBacker
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
    • Appeals
    • Assault Charges
    • Asset Forfeiture
    • Carjackings
    • Drug Crimes
    • Federal Crimes
    • Grand Jury Investigations
    • Gun Crimes
    • Homicide
    • RICO Charges
    • Sex Crimes
    • Theft, Robbery And Burglary
    • Vehicular Homicide
    • White Collar Crimes
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Areas We Serve
    • Champaign County
    • Peoria County
    • Winnebago County

Call or text us for a free consultation: 312-444-0907

Wolf Criminal Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Bill Wolf
    • Jack DeBacker
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
    • Appeals
    • Assault Charges
    • Asset Forfeiture
    • Carjackings
    • Drug Crimes
    • Federal Crimes
    • Grand Jury Investigations
    • Gun Crimes
    • Homicide
    • RICO Charges
    • Sex Crimes
    • Theft, Robbery And Burglary
    • Vehicular Homicide
    • White Collar Crimes
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Areas We Serve
    • Champaign County
    • Peoria County
    • Winnebago County
Email

CALL

Attorney Bill Wolf

We Represent Clients In Chicago And Statewide, Including Cook, Will, Kane And DuPage Counties

  1. Home
  2.  – 
  3. Firm News
  4.  – 
  5. NUMBER 4 OF BILL WOLF’S “TOP TEN” FOURTH AMENDMENT CASES FOR ILLINOIS LAWYERS: THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT CASE OF PEOPLE V. MANZO

NUMBER 4 OF BILL WOLF’S “TOP TEN” FOURTH AMENDMENT CASES FOR ILLINOIS LAWYERS: THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT CASE OF PEOPLE V. MANZO

On Behalf of Wolf Criminal Law | Dec 31, 2019 | Firm News

An Illinois State Trooper performed a legitimate traffic stop, and learned the Defendant was driving a rental car. The trooper places the Defendant in the trooper’s car for 25 minutes seeking proof that the Defendant was a listed driver on the rental car, including contacting the rental car company.

The trooper eventually arrests the driver for criminal trespass of the rental vehicle, searches the vehicle as an inventory search, discovering narcotics. The trial court granted the motion to quash arrest, and the appellate court affirmed.

The appellate court held waiting to hear from the rental car company unreasonably prolonged the stop based on the United States Supreme Court decision in Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 1609 (2015). Rodriguez , permits a police officer may make “ordinary inquiries incident to the stop.” such as checking a driver’s license and vehicle registration.” Here, although the delay was not to wait for a narcotics dog, contacting the rental car company and the accompanying delay that went with that communication was not incident to the stop nor was it for the purposes of a safety check.

The case is People v. Cassino, 2019 IL App. (1st) 181510. Decided 6/7/2019

https://courts.illinois.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2019/1stDistrict/1181510.pdf

Recent Posts

  • How a “gang member” label can block diversion in Cook County
  • 4 mistakes to avoid when pursuing a criminal appeal
  • How defense attorneys work to suppress confessions before a trial
  • Why a broken chain of custody can get a case dismissed
  • 2 common consequences tied to RICO charges in Illinois

Archives

  • August 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • August 2023
  • April 2022
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • December 2019
  • August 2019

Categories

  • Asset Forfeiture
  • Criminal Defense
  • Firm News

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Us For A Free Consultation

Wolf Criminal Law


Address

35 E. Wacker Drive
Suite 1980
Chicago, IL 60601

Chicago Law Office



Contact

Phone: 312-444-0907

Review The Firm
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Wolf Criminal Law • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

  • Follow
  • Follow