Wolf Criminal Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Bill Wolf
    • Jack DeBacker
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
    • Appeals
    • Assault Charges
    • Asset Forfeiture
    • Carjackings
    • Drug Crimes
    • Federal Crimes
    • Grand Jury Investigations
    • Gun Crimes
    • Homicide
    • RICO Charges
    • Sex Crimes
    • Theft, Robbery And Burglary
    • Vehicular Homicide
    • White Collar Crimes
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Areas We Serve
    • Champaign County
    • Peoria County
    • Winnebago County

Call or text us for a free consultation: 312-444-0907

Wolf Criminal Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Bill Wolf
    • Jack DeBacker
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
    • Appeals
    • Assault Charges
    • Asset Forfeiture
    • Carjackings
    • Drug Crimes
    • Federal Crimes
    • Grand Jury Investigations
    • Gun Crimes
    • Homicide
    • RICO Charges
    • Sex Crimes
    • Theft, Robbery And Burglary
    • Vehicular Homicide
    • White Collar Crimes
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Areas We Serve
    • Champaign County
    • Peoria County
    • Winnebago County
Email

CALL

Attorney Bill Wolf

We Represent Clients In Chicago And Statewide, Including Cook, Will, Kane And DuPage Counties

  1. Home
  2.  – 
  3. Firm News
  4.  – 
  5. NUMBER 3 OF BILL WOLF’S “TOP TEN” FOURTH AMENDMENT CASES FOR ILLINOIS LAWYERS: THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT CASE OF PEOPLE V. MANZO

NUMBER 3 OF BILL WOLF’S “TOP TEN” FOURTH AMENDMENT CASES FOR ILLINOIS LAWYERS: THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT CASE OF PEOPLE V. MANZO

On Behalf of Wolf Criminal Law | Dec 29, 2019 | Firm News

This case was actually decided in December of 2018, but my law clerk convinced me that it should be included in my presentation, and I believe she was right.

In this case, the Illinois Supreme Court concluded that the affidavit for a search warrant for a home was nothing more than a “bare bones’ affidavit with respect to the Defendant’s home. The police were investigating a woman by the name of Casilas, which included three narcotics transactions with undercover officers, two of the three of them being in the vicinity of the Defendant’s home where a known associate of Casilas lived.

The warrant sought that the judge signed was for Casilas, a specific vehicle, and the home. The Court found these facts to be insufficient for the home, and refused to invoke the good faith exception because the affidavit so lacked indicia of probable cause (“bare bones”) as to render official belief in its existence unreasonable.

The case is People v. Manzo, 2018 IL 122761 (2018). Decided 12/28/2018.

https://courts.illinois.gov/Opinions/SupremeCourt/2018/122761.pdf

Recent Posts

  • How a “gang member” label can block diversion in Cook County
  • 4 mistakes to avoid when pursuing a criminal appeal
  • How defense attorneys work to suppress confessions before a trial
  • Why a broken chain of custody can get a case dismissed
  • 2 common consequences tied to RICO charges in Illinois

Archives

  • August 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • August 2023
  • April 2022
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • December 2019
  • August 2019

Categories

  • Asset Forfeiture
  • Criminal Defense
  • Firm News

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Us For A Free Consultation

Wolf Criminal Law


Address

35 E. Wacker Drive
Suite 1980
Chicago, IL 60601

Chicago Law Office



Contact

Phone: 312-444-0907

Review The Firm
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Wolf Criminal Law • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw

  • Follow
  • Follow