We Represent Clients in Chicago And Statewide, Including Cook, Will, Kane And DuPage Counties

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Firm News
  4.  » NUMBER 8 OF BILL WOLF’S “TOP TEN” FOURTH AMENDMENT CASES FOR ILLINOIS LAWYERS: THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT CASE OF PEOPLE V. MUELLER

NUMBER 8 OF BILL WOLF’S “TOP TEN” FOURTH AMENDMENT CASES FOR ILLINOIS LAWYERS: THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT CASE OF PEOPLE V. MUELLER

On Behalf of | Dec 31, 2019 | Firm News

Here, an Illinois State Trooper pulled over an automobile after three separate times, the car touched momentarily either the yellow line or the white fog line based on improper lane usage. This led to a DUI prosecution. The Defendant’s Motion to Quash Arrest was granted, and the State appealed.The Appellate Court affirmed. After looking into the definition of what a lane is, the Court concluded there was no reasonable suspicion to believe that the Defendant broke the law. Momentary contact with the lane does not constitute a violation of the statute.

The case is People v. Mueller, 2018 IL App. (2nd) 170863. Decided 12/13/2018Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing 1/18/2019Petition for Leave for Appeal Denied, People v. Mueller, 119 N.E.3d 1027 (3/20/2019)

https://courts.illinois.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2018/2ndDistrict/2170863.pdf